<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Testing on It Might be Working</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/testing/</link><description>Recent content in Testing on It Might be Working</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Jeff Mayeur</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 09:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/testing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Go Fish: TDD and Agentic Code</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/05-2026/go-fish/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 09:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/05-2026/go-fish/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;I’m not a TDD devotee, but throughout my career there have been times when I’ve found it to be an effective pattern—not only to ensure that code does what I expect, but also because it allows me to think about program structure in discrete chunks. The focus on testability has helped me dissect the functional layers of an application in ways I didn’t when focusing on sequence diagrams or flowcharts.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>