<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Leadership on It Might be Working</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/leadership/</link><description>Recent content in Leadership on It Might be Working</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Jeff Mayeur</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 07:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/leadership/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Demons in the Details</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/05-2026/the-demons-in-the-details/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 07:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/05-2026/the-demons-in-the-details/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;Precision vs. Speed, Precision at Speed, or Precision with Speed. There are lots of posts that cover the challenge of integrating AI speed with human precision in the pursuit of value. Lots of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe it's an important conversation. It must be had. Be that as it may, I think the long pole in unlocking productivity with intelligence tools is the reimagining of leadership roles. I suspect leadership teams are less prepared than they would like to think.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>