<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Design Patterns on It Might be Working</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/design-patterns/</link><description>Recent content in Design Patterns on It Might be Working</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Jeff Mayeur</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://iguessthatworks.com/tags/design-patterns/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Seven Languages, Revisited</title><link>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/07-2026/seven/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://iguessthatworks.com/posts/07-2026/seven/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;I've been thinking it's time for me to revisit &lt;a href="https://pragprog.com/titles/btlang/seven-languages-in-seven-weeks/"&gt;Seven Languages in Seven Weeks&lt;/a&gt;. It was one of those books that sunk its claws into me. While I didn't end up deploying those languages in a professional setting, I remember the focus on the what and why for each language's capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part of my interest in revisiting this book is to backstop the intellectual ossification that agentic first development is creating. I'm also curious if I still find as much joy in the quirks these languages bring to the table. At base though I want to use it as an exercise to shift my thinking around code generation. So far I've used agents to create code using the same platforms I would use if I were hand coding a solution. I'm sticking with what I know, both because I have experience with it working, and because I will have the ability to audit and debug any output.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>